Weban individual investigation of the company. Id. at 8–9; Third Rede- termination, ECF No. 107.17 While the court affirmed as reasonable Commerce’s inference of a more than de minimis separate rate and use of rates from the FirstAdministrative Review, Changzhou Hawd, __ CIT at __, 44 F. Supp. 3d at 1385–88, it found Commerce’s decision WebU.S. Court of International Trade Slip Op. 15–79 RUBBERMAID COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Court No. 11–00463 [Sustaining Commerce’s remand results revising interpretation of exclusions from scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s …
Did you know?
WebSlip Op. 22- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN RE SECTION 301 CASES Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, and ... claims as non-justiciable pursuant to U.S. Court of International Trade (“USCIT”) Rule 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.1. Defs.’ WebMay 12, 2024 · Risen Energy Co. v. United States, No. 20-03912 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2024) Annotate this Case. Download PDF.
WebSlip Op. 21-49 (April 29, 2024), CIT Court No. 18-00191 FINAL RESULTS OF REDETERMINATION PURSUANT TO REMAND ORDER I. SUMMARY The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has prepared these final results of redetermination pursuant to the United States Court of International Trade’s (CIT or the Court) WebUNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVENERGY RENEWABLES LLC, Plaintiff, and SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, CLEARWAY ENERGY GROUP LLC, EDF RENEWABLES, INC. and ... United States, 44 CIT __, Slip Op. 20-144 (Oct. 15, 2024), ECF No. 252, 253 (“Invenergy IV”). Accordingly, the court issued a …
WebU.S. Court of International Trade Slip Op. 15–71 CHANGZHOU HAWD FLOORING CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Before: Donald C. Pogue, … WebMar 23, 2016 · Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co. v. United States, No. 14-00287 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016) case opinion from the US Court of International Trade
WebNov 16, 2024 · slip op. 21- united states court of international trade solar energy industries association, nextera energy, inc., invenergy renewables llc, and edf renewables, inc., plaintiffs, v. united states, united states customs and border protection, and troy a. miller, in his official capacity as acting commissioner of united states customs and border
WebU.S. Court of International Trade Slip Op. 20–103 HUSTEEL CO., LTD. et al., Plaintiff and Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES et al., ... See id., 44 CIT at __, 426 F. Supp. 3d at 1389–92. The court also held that Commerce failed to address why it was incorporated organisation ukWebAug 2, 2024 · Slip Op. 17-96 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE GERSON COMPANY, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge v. Court No. 11-00225 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Determining, upon cross-motions for summary judgment, the tariff classification of certain imported candle-like articles … incorporated or limitedWebSlip Op. 23-15 POR: 01/01/2024 – 12/31/2024 Public Document E&C/OV: Team Hyundai Steel Company v. United States, Court No. 21-00536, Slip Op. 21-15 (CIT February 10, 2024) Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea FINAL RESULTS OF REDETERMINATION PURSUANT TO COURT REMAND I. SUMMARY incorporated organisationWebSlip Opinions 2024 Note: The Court works to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of this information. However, researchers should independently verify the status of the opinions … incivility in the medical fieldWebInj. Order and Op., Invenergy Renewables LLC v. United States, 43 CIT __, __, Slip Op. No. 19–00153 (Dec. 5, 2024), ECF No. 113 (“PI”), the court now returns to a challenge to an agency action taken by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) regarding the exclusion of safeguard duties on bifacial solar panels ... incivility in the nhsWeb, 42 CIT at __, Slip Op. 18–141 at 11–12, 13–14, 20–22. On remand, Commerce reexamined these three factors pursuant to its substantial transformation analysis and again con-cluded, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the seamless unfinished OCTG in question falls within the scope of the Orders. incivility in the militaryWebMar 16, 1995 · The parties agree that the subject merchandise is an assembly consisting of the following elements: (1) a toothed pinion gear; (2) a pinion sleeve; (3) a barrel with a helical spline; (4) a washer; (5) a cover; (6) five small rollers; (7) five small springs; (8) a nylon flange; and (9) a snap ring. incorporated organisations tasmania